Insurance

“Trouble Began Soon After” — A Weekend Case Study for Those Involved with Property Insurance Adjustments

The federal judge’s remark in a denied summary judgment opinion from a fire loss currently in litigation caught my attention.1 I often wonder about the reasons why some cases resolve without litigation or appraisal, and some do not. Accordingly, I propose that readers of this post read the full opinion and think—

  • What should the policyholder have done differently?
  • What should the insurance adjuster for AmGuard have done differently?
  • What do you think about the handling of the proof of loss?
  • Should the insurer have paid the amount of the undisputed amount of property damage?
  • What could have been done to avoid the litigation?
  • What do you think about the tone of the communications between the parties?

Please take some time to reflect on these questions while reading the opinion.

,

Related posts

A number of Disaster Adjusters—What Policyholders, Contractors, and Public Adjusters Ought to Do

sesiv

Is Wind Pushed Rain Coated? Is Water Injury Occurring Over Many Years From Rainstorms Coated?

sesiv

Insurance Professor Jay Feinman Comments About Insurance Fraud Statistics

sesiv