Insurance

“Trouble Began Soon After” — A Weekend Case Study for Those Involved with Property Insurance Adjustments

The federal judge’s remark in a denied summary judgment opinion from a fire loss currently in litigation caught my attention.1 I often wonder about the reasons why some cases resolve without litigation or appraisal, and some do not. Accordingly, I propose that readers of this post read the full opinion and think—

  • What should the policyholder have done differently?
  • What should the insurance adjuster for AmGuard have done differently?
  • What do you think about the handling of the proof of loss?
  • Should the insurer have paid the amount of the undisputed amount of property damage?
  • What could have been done to avoid the litigation?
  • What do you think about the tone of the communications between the parties?

Please take some time to reflect on these questions while reading the opinion.

,

Related posts

Hurricane Reduction and Hope Is What’s Wanted the Day After the Catastrophe

sesiv

Dioxins Are Extraordinarily Harmful and Can not Be Missed Following Wildfires

sesiv

Ought to All States Require Insurance coverage Firms to Flip Claims Information Over to Policyholders?

sesiv